Phenomenological Reviews

Series | Book | Chapter

225283

On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology

I. C. Jarvie

pp. 107-126

Abstract

Theories of fieldwork explain why anthropologists do fieldwork. They are theories of method, since fieldwork is a method of doing anthropology (other methods include the arm-chair, the library, by proxy, the questionnaire, informants, and so on).2 There are parallel theories to explain why natural scientists employ the empirical method, i.e. observation and experiment. All schools of anthropology emphasize that fieldwork stands at the center of the subject. Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown, who thought anthropology was a science, placed the same emphasis on fieldwork as does Evans-Pritchard, who denies that it is a science. My concern is to pin down exactly what benefit anthropology and anthropologists derive from fieldwork.

Publication details

Published in:

Jarvie I. C. (1986) Thinking about society: theory and practice. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 107-126

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5424-3_7

Full citation:

Jarvie I. C. (1986) On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology, In: Thinking about society, Dordrecht, Springer, 107–126.