On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology
pp. 107-126
Abstract
Theories of fieldwork explain why anthropologists do fieldwork. They are theories of method, since fieldwork is a method of doing anthropology (other methods include the arm-chair, the library, by proxy, the questionnaire, informants, and so on).2 There are parallel theories to explain why natural scientists employ the empirical method, i.e. observation and experiment. All schools of anthropology emphasize that fieldwork stands at the center of the subject. Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown, who thought anthropology was a science, placed the same emphasis on fieldwork as does Evans-Pritchard, who denies that it is a science. My concern is to pin down exactly what benefit anthropology and anthropologists derive from fieldwork.
Publication details
Published in:
Jarvie I. C. (1986) Thinking about society: theory and practice. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 107-126
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5424-3_7
Full citation:
Jarvie I. C. (1986) On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology, In: Thinking about society, Dordrecht, Springer, 107–126.