Book | Chapter
Dialogue of rationalities
a case study
pp. 219-228
Abstract
The paper challenges the received view regarding rationality and dialogue . According to Leibniz, different kinds of rationality not only co-exist but also do not exclude each other or attempt to render the other acceptable or intelligible only in one's own terms. The relevant distinction for the construal of conflicting rationalities is that between hard and soft rationality.
Publication details
Published in:
Rebuschi Manuel, Heinzmann Gerhard, Musiol Michel, Trognon Alain (2014) Interdisciplinary works in logic, epistemology, psychology and linguistics: dialogue, rationality, and formalism. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 219-228
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03044-9_10
Full citation:
Dascal Marcelo (2014) „Dialogue of rationalities: a case study“, In: M. Rebuschi, G. Heinzmann, M. Musiol & A. Trognon (eds.), Interdisciplinary works in logic, epistemology, psychology and linguistics, Dordrecht, Springer, 219–228.