Book | Chapter
The a priori, intuitionism, and moral language
pp. 244-261
Abstract
Recent Anglo-Saxon, and especially British ethical theory has developed upon the assumption that something more satisfactory than ethical intuitionism was philosophically necessary. To discover that the good was unanalysable, to be intuited, and consequently either noted or not noted, as the case may be, by the attentive observer was not as philosophically or morally helpful as one might wish. In the attempt to overcome this deficiency contemporary moral philosophers, especially the "prescriptivists", turned to the language of morals to understand how this language functioned, and how its more descriptive and more evaluative functions (assuming these may be distinguished) were related.
Publication details
Published in:
Durfee Harold (1987) Foundational reflections: studies in contemporary philosophy. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 244-261
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3593-8_11
Full citation:
Durfee Harold (1987) The a priori, intuitionism, and moral language, In: Foundational reflections, Dordrecht, Springer, 244–261.