Phenomenological Reviews

Series | Book | Chapter

146566

Empathy and anti-empathy

which are the problems?

Michela Summa(Wurzburg University)

pp. 87-105

Abstract

This chapter has two related aims. The first one is to bring to the fore the potential of a "multi-layered' account of empathy. The second one is to clarify the role of imagination in empathy, with particular attention to the process of "centrally imagining' what the other is experiencing. The argument is based on the comparison between Peter Goldie's and Edith Stein's accounts of empathy. As to the first point, I will show that Goldie's rather sophisticated concept of empathy already presupposes basic layers of understanding, which are more thoroughly clarified in Stein's analyses. As to the second point, I will argue that empathy, in its different layers, significantly relies on imagination, and more precisely on "central imagining'. In order to clarify the meaning of "central imagining', without incurring into either conceptual and phenomenological paradoxes or ethically dubious statements, a closer consideration of how the imagining subject is and can be involved in interpersonal perspectival shift is required.

Publication details

Published in:

Magrì Elisa, Moran Dermot (2017) Empathy, sociality, and personhood: essays on Edith Stein's phenomenological investigations. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 87-105

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71096-9_5

Full citation:

Summa Michela (2017) „Empathy and anti-empathy: which are the problems?“, In: E. Magrì & D. Moran (eds.), Empathy, sociality, and personhood, Dordrecht, Springer, 87–105.